This came to my attention by my friend Ciarán Mc Ardle. He sends me an email from time to time. Hopefully you'll like his comments below on this interview:
This is an interesting video from Randal Rauser and Mark Karris on how Christianity was a nasty Hellfire-and-damnation cult for most of its history, and the psychological damage caused by this damnation cult.
One of the reasons why I love The Necessity of Atheism by David Marshall Brooks (1902-1994) is because he describes how humanity has become more adept at creating unfalsifiable gods.
It used to be that if a wiley priest wanted to invent an unfalsifiable God, all he needed to do was put Him on top of an unclimbable mountain. Thus the peak of Olympus, Horeb, and Sinai, were all residences for gods.
Today, though, to make a God unfalsifiable, said God must be immaterial, timeless, transcendent, immanent... i.e. something that evades all means of phyiscally detecting him.
And this, I feel, is what Randal Rauser and Karris have done. Their God is "panentheistic", which means that their God is reality itself. If we define God as reality itself, then, sure: God exists. If we define God as a pizza, then sure: millions of Gods exist.
Karris in this video strongly states that the Christian God is merely a projection into the sky, of our hopes, fears, ideals and prejudices. An atheist would agree with this statement.
It is like Jordan Peterson who said that God is a fictional character... and yet refuses the term, "atheist". Even I am guilty of this. I don't call myself an atheist because I am not a strict naturalist, I sometimes pray, and I like to consider the Reality itself as a god in embryo. However, do I believe in a transcendent Classically theistic God? No! Do I believe in a God separate from His creation—the definition of a transcendent God—no!
So at this point, I am not really sure how Karris's position differs substantially from that of John Loftus's. And if Randal Rauser is not really pushing back, then it is hard to discern how Rauser's position differs substantially from Loftus's at this point.
Sure, Jesus Loves Canaanites, if "Jesus" is nothing more than a projection of Randal Rauser's mind!
This is why Rauser is one to watch. In recent videos he is sailing very close to the atheist wind. Rauser is even antitheistic towards versions of Christianity that take the Bible's command to beat their children with a rod. In Ethiopia, the oldest Christian country, it is common, according to Rauser, for Ethiopians to have scarred backs from when their parents beat them with rods.
Rauser is antitheistic towards Alicia Childers's version of Christianity.
Perhaps one day, Rauser will sail just a little too close to the atheist wind, and discover that he is, in fact, an atheist.
According to Loftus, Rauser seems headed for Most Reverend Bishop Shelby Spong's (1931-2021) version of Christianity. Spong, despite his being an Anglican Bishop, was an atheist.
I've had the "dying empire" feeling since Ronny RayGun who, IMO, was almost supernaturally stupid and exhibited the cruelty that's typically one side effect of stupidity. Two...
I think our capacity to think on such a small scale (as in what is immediately before me) is a big part of why misery, mortality, and stupidity surround you every day. (Hey, you might notice me...
Calderón de la Barca's famous play, La vida es sueño -- Life Is a Dream -- may have may have been skirting a fundamental insight: humanity lives in a castle of perpetual self-deception which...
Well, Trump did campaign on the slogan "Only I can fix it" so we don't even have to wait to get to heaven to see all our problems vanish in an instant with one blow of the trump[et]....
Depending on the precise definition of "things" that might be more than two. A case could be made for four: 1. Knowing people makes the prospect of eternity in heaven with them sound...
"...they believe that in their current meat form they can accurately anticipate that they will like heaven." Oh, they'll "all be changed— in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye,...
Great video, but: 1. Maletin talks about the pleasures of life (or, at least of his life), and how these compensate for the nonexistence of imaginary gods. Wholly or at least partly agreed,...
Just two things. I decided, having known many of them, that the the prospect of spending Eternity in Heaven with members of my family makes a compelling argument for going to Hell. Just saying. Why...
This old dude sounds like some pre-senescent, self-acclaimed gadfly / curmudgeon / prophet who we should all be listening to because we have been fed a plate of bile by our masters in Congress. We...
You would lose the first half of that bet. The gaswasting climate-raping terrorist-supporting and right-wing-politician-supporting motorists in my locale never allow the cyclist to...
You can imagine the difficulty, political and cultural and linguistic and otherwise, with educating people who learned to cycle in the third world. (Where traffic fatality rates dwarf...
I had my own table and played for years until the arthritis in my hands got so bad I couldn't play for more than about fifteen minutes at a time. Finally gave my cues to my grand son.
Haha, over on Feser's blog, someone invited me to consult ChatGPT about the spelling hylomorphic vs hylemorphic. I asked the question twice, giving names of different academics, and the two...
Stats on cars as killing more than do bikes are always being posted on other sites I troll visit. I wasn't talking about cars. I just said that many New Yorkers believe that the police...